strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
strict warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. Please use the date.timezone setting, the TZ environment variable or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/modules/node.module on line 1009.
warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/includes/common.inc:406) in /var/www/html/windrosesoftware.com/support/includes/common.inc on line 160.
]>
Windrose Support Knowedge Base - direction for webmasters
http://windrosesoftware.com/support
to provide the best of category tools for ecommerce professionalsenWhy does OptiLink seem to ignore the robots.txt file?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/107
<p>OptiLink does not look at robots.txt because it is not a spider. It will take whatever you give it in the additional pages list and/or whatever is returned from the search engines you tell it to access.<br />
By way of contrast, OptiSpider is a spider and does obey the robots exclusion file.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:21:38 -0600Can I use OptiLink to get a report of the # of pages, PR, int. and ext. links of a target domain and its pages?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/105
<p>The combination of OptiLink and OptiSpider used together can <i>almost</i> do what you want, with one caveat.<br />
Here goes:<br />
First run OptiSpider on the domain where you are considering links. This will spider all the pages on the site, which should be all and only the pages Google will find.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:05:16 -0600I have my product key, but I can't unlock OptiLink. What's going on?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/104
<p>The basic diagnostic approach is to first verify that OptiLink works correctly in Demo Mode. If you can get results using 10 links at hotbot, then OptiLink <i>is</i> clearly getting access to the web. Then, we simply need to enter the auth key in OptiLink's File->Setup dialog and see if that works correctly. You must be connected to the internet while doing this.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:07:03 -0600Should I include both Google and Google cache in the same run to make sure I am getting all the links?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/103
<p>Doing that analysis doesn't really make much sense -- it is never meaningful to include Google and Google cache in the same<br />
run as this is classic "apples and oranges". These two interfaces will always analyze precisely the same set of links, the only difference being what versions of the pages are analyzed. The GoogleCache looks at Google's snapshot of the</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:08:36 -0600How do I edit down the table sizes for the OptiLink report.>
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/102
<p>You can save and edit the report html files and insert CSS like the following.</p>
<p>table {display: table;table-layout: fixed;}<br />
tr {}<br />
td {overflow: scroll;width: 20%;}</p>
<p>This works in IE, it does not work correctly in Netscape/Mozilla :-((. For those browsers, change the overflow: scroll to overflow: hidden -- the full URL is still available by coping the cell contents with copy/paste.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:51:19 -0600Can you explain the difference between OptiLink and OptiSpider?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/101
<p>OptiLink analyzes a single page, whereas OptiSpider analyzes all the pages of a given domain.</p>
<p>OptiLink depends primarily on the search engines to discover linking pages, both internal and external, while OptiSite discovers all internal links automatically.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:38:29 -0600why is it that only a few sites seem to have their internal pages recognized by Google?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/99
<p>The filtering of link results by google is mostly about the page rank of the linking pages. Internal links are just as good as external links for building both link reputation and Page Rank.</p>
<p>To see if your pages are included in the google index, type the URL of the page into the Google search box and see if it recognizes it as a URL in its index. Also check your server logs to see what pages googlebot has visited.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:58:06 -0600If I buy OptiLink do you think Google will end up banning my IP address just for using it?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/98
<p>Optilink incorporates 'stealth features' so your IP looks just like any heterogeneous computer network to the outside world. This makes it very hard to find a reliable signature of what is or is not OptiLink in operation. In two and half years there has never been a case of an OptiLink user being shutoff by Google.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:18:43 -0600Does the "PageLoader IOException" mean anything that I need to worry about?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/97
<p>The IOException error indicates that OptiTools was not able to load a webpage. It automatically retries several times, so you may see several of these errors together. These errors are caused by any of:</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:20:10 -0600Do I need to use Arelis in addition to OptiLink?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/95
<p>It all depends on what you are trying to do. For Ranking Analysis, it is off-page factors that are key and only OptiLink can help there. But if you are instead wanting to manage a Reciprocal Linking project, Arelis is probably very useful (I do not know from my own experience).<br />
OptiLink will be helpful as well by providing data about potential linking partners so you can pick and choose where to apply your effort for best results.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:37:44 -0600On some pages OptiLink will show a target link as being "not found", but a manual check shows it. Why has OptiLink not found it?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/94
<p>Optilink avoids doing DNS lookups as a speed improvement, so what it does instead is to match the text of the URL. It attempts to find multiple forms of the target URL, but it is not perfect. For the target url xyz.com, Optilink will test www.xyz.com to see if it is the same IP address and looks like the same page. All internal pages on the target URL will also be loaded and checksumed and compared to the target page so we can usually figure out that www.xyz.com/index.html is actually the same link as xyz.com.<br />
But there are some cases the program can not handle, which is what the 'aliases' list is for. You might have noticed that OptiLink automatically fills in the aliases it does find. You can add aliases as well for those cases where OptiLink would not be able to discover it.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:40:13 -0600How come OptiLink fails to process sites with unusual domain names?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/91
<p>Look at the log view and you will probably see that optilink is failing when parsing the target page. Just select the 'skip on-page measurements' option and rerun -- you will loose the on-page kw %, but that is of little importance in ranking anyway. Also, run your pages through the validator at validator.w3.org to ensure they are error free.</p>
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:56:43 -0600link:www.mysite in Google gives 0 links but link: www.mysite (with a space) returns many links. Which is correct?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/80
<p>The search with the space between link: is a search for pages including the domain that link anywhere -- not what you want</p>
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:34:35 -0600If I want to outrank for total links what number(s) should I be looking at in the summary report?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/79
<p>The combination of link quantity and link quality is the real target, so what I typically try to do is get better quality and the same number of links. I will generally use the link counts reported by yahoo instead of google.</p>
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:25:22 -0600Who's numbers are right OptiLink or Google?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/78
<p>They are both 'right', they just mean two different things. The number returned from Google is not the real link count -- which there is no way to get --but it is a relative measure for comparison between two pages in the rankings. Moreover, since the spider always lags the real web, there will often be pages in the SE's index that no longer link to the target page, but since they are in the index, they do count in the ranking algorithm.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the OptiLink number is the measure right now of the real web, so it could be considered a prospective measure of what the SE index will show once it catches up with changes.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:44:09 -0600What numbers are most important/valid in my evaluation of link quantity?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/77
<p>Total links and total pages with links are both important.</p>
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:22:31 -0600Why are the number of links found and processed greater than the number of pages?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/76
<p>Since there may be more than one link per page, this number will be equal to or greater than the number of pages found with (at least one) link.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:45:28 -0600Why don't # pages that are missing links + # pages that have links to target page = unique pages analyzed?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/75
<p>The seemingly missing pages aren't there because they didn't load. Typically these sites will simply be too slow to respond in the network timeout period set or the sites will simply no longer exist but still be in the index. The numbers (pages that are missing links and pages that have links to target page) are the total of pages actually loaded, rather than the number of urls returned by the SE.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:46:10 -0600In Google, why is the number of unique pages not the same as the number of available links?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/74
<p>The reported count is just an estimate so they can provide quick results without actually counting. This is but one example of a heuristic, or short-cut, taken by search engines so that they can deal with huge datasets and still provide rapid response to us users.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:48:45 -0600The percentages shown under the Compare Tab don't total 100%. Are the rest image links with no alt tag?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/73
<p>The alt text is not counted. This decision is made based on experiments I ran and measurements I made that showed Google in particular was not counting the alt text in the Reputation analysis. Image links are therefore 'empty' of text so the total of words in the numerator of the computation can indeed be smaller than the total of links used as the denominator -- hence less than 100%.<br />
Also, there is one other trick in the numerator that is well founded in observation, but is still open to some argument: a given word repeated in the same link counts as a single occurrance, not multiple occurrances. For example, the link 'blah blah blah' will credit the word 'blah' with a single link, not three.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:00:26 -0600Can we see all of our link results from Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart side by side, or do we have to perform separate searches?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/72
<p>Seperate. the primary purpose of OptiLink is ranking analysis,<br />
so a comparison of SE-reported links as not a feature, but it is<br />
easy to copy to a spreadsheet or just put multiple OptiLink's<br />
side-by-side</p>
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:06:11 -0600How could a page show 0 target links to my target URL in the Pages tab?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/71
<p>Primarily one of two ways.<br />
1. The search engines are by nature out of date, so it may really be that the search engine is reporting a link that is now gone.<br />
2. OptiLink, to be fast, compares URL strings rather than doing DNS lookups, so it will miss legitimate links where the site is known by two different domains. For example, acws.com and academywebspecialist.com are the same site and treated the same by the engines, but OptiLink will not automatically do so -- you have to manually provide the alias on the command view.<br />
To tell which problem you might be seeing, select the offending page in the pages view and use the right mouse button to look at all the links on the page (view links). From this you should be able to find either an alias for the target page, or verify that the link is in fact missing.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:01:40 -0600Can I use OptiLink to check backlinks to expired domains?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/69
<p>Yes, OptiLink works great for that application. The on-page analysis will be all zeros since the page can not be loaded, but all the linking information will be collected as for non-expired pages.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:42:19 -0600How can I do accurate analysis with OptiLink when Google's info can be a month old?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/68
<p>First, whatever Google has is what it is using to do ranking so that is what we need to use in doing ranking analysis and prediction. where the results are being used for another purpose, you may be concerned about the currency of the data.<br />
But actually, it is much worse than that...<br />
Google does not return all links when doing the link: query (same as backlinks on the toolbar) but instead filters out lower PR pages from the set of linking pages in its database. This incomplete picture introduces a number of complications, but again, for ranking analysis it turns out not to matter since the same filters are in place for all pages.</p>
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:03:40 -0600Does OptiLink check that the backlinks really exist on sites reported by Google?
http://windrosesoftware.com/support/?q=node/67
<p>Yes. That is how OptiLink does the analysis we call Link Reputation. OptiLink must find the actual text use in the link. All the pages returned by the search engine are listed on the Pages view, along with<br />
the number of links to the target page that were actually found and processed -- zero indicates a missing link.</p>
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:04:07 -0600